レンタルカートからフォーミュラまで!走行会でも御馴染み♪
低価格&プロ仕様 マイクロカプセル型GPSロガー「デジスパイス」
[New!!]

2010年07月18日

Electric racing kart: Hot conversation, calm conversation.


Motor sports "NEXT STAGE" >> Top page


There are a lot of people who interrupts it and progress the opinion like the flood when I offer the topic.

It becomes impossible for me to intervene when interrupting once then.

It is not already the conversation, and I have to hear it as speech partner's solo perfomance association.

Where was not the other party able to like though I wanted to talk with him or her and proposed the topic to them?

It thinks so by shutting the ear in the solo performance association.

The other party takes up the key word of 2 and 3 in such a case from among my topic.

At that time, the key word is taken up attended with a strong preconception.

As a result, they make up the topic concerning the theme that I did not think of.

I good of the person nod in the punctuation marks part of the solo performance association where the intonation exists, having my face that looks like listing to it.

I like going so far as to say when beginning to discuss somewhat, and request them accurate grounds of an argument.

Therefore, the opinion is not offered from me as much as possible in such a case.

It is because of becoming the fight.

However, what the other party wanted to say in this kind of solo performance association is not often understood to the last minute.

Do they like the theme very much?

If it is so, I am glad.

However, if they try to defeat me, I am anxious what I do them and offend them.

And, I come to hate to talk them when this continues.

I just want to enjoy a lot of conversations that can draw out an interesting idea from one another's opinions each other.

On the other hand, the conversation that the computer throws me is very lucid.

PC: "Because the port was used by other applications, this program was not able to be started."

I: 「Really? Then, it is necessary to stop the applications. What is the application?」

PC: "Because the port was used by other applications, this program was not able to be started."

I:"Yes, it was heard ahead from you. "

PC: "Because the port was used by other applications, this program was not able to be started."

I:"Well, I am changing the question a little. "

PC:"I cannot answer your question. Because I do not know about it. "

I:"Ok, I understood. "

Though my opinion also cannot be accepted in this case, he or she answers lucidly because they understand my intention.

In this case, I only have to enjoy the conversation between other applications and the error logs.

However, the guess doesn't take side with me, "How much does the other party give the useful information?", and "Where can I find the other party?".

Thus, I had been annoyed by the error of the server last night.

The work of the continuation will occupy a lot of my time today.

I went to the refresh room to get the rest for the lack of sleep, after I arrived at the office in this morning.

At that time, I was made to hear the solo performance association like the flood for 30 minutes or more.

I think that I was opened from worry concerning the server error momentarily by this flood.

This might have been lucky.

However, I have saved up another frustration.




posted by papacchi at 18:45| Comment(0) | 8.活動費 | このブログの読者になる | 更新情報をチェックする
この記事へのコメント
コメントを書く
お名前:

メールアドレス:

ホームページアドレス:

コメント:

※ブログオーナーが承認したコメントのみ表示されます。
×

この広告は1年以上新しい記事の投稿がないブログに表示されております。